Nature, not Imagine

Nature, not Imagine Mathematicians can be pig-headed. Sometimes there are problems that do not admit of solution, but the mathematician ignores common sense and independence of the press. A question is "WHEN IN A 'UNIT CIRCLE, POINT AND A FIVE UNIT AT THE HEART OF THE LAW? Pythagoras gave an answer. The hypotenuse is one unit, so that square. The square is still a unit. Now you can right. This is five units. Twenty-five square and take off. Here is the square root. However, a minimum of twenty-five is twenty-four. What is the root of a negative number? No reply! But common sense says that can not be in a circle, where also the center of the radio. The answer "not on the Circle" jumps to mind. Girolamo Cardano was a mathematician who was also consulted by Leonardo da Vinci. E 'was also a player, but used his knowledge of the probability of obtaining the best of their opponents. It was decided that the solution. To split the problem into two parts. The root of 36 is 6. However, we can treat the root of 4 times 9 - in which case you have the root of the root of 4 times 9. The answer is the same. Therefore, we search the root of -1 times the root of 24. The root of any negative number is the root of -1 times the root of the absolute value of that number. So the root of -36 is the root of -1 six times. The root of -1 is defined as imaginary, so that the root is imaginary -36 SEIS. And the answer to the position in a unit circle of the point X = 5? IMAGINARY ROOTS that Y = 24. Cardano was derided. Dead. The passage of time, gradually and mathematics communities have begun to realize that the idea was not so bad after all. This is a new technique. To troubleshoot, please follow the rules slavishly. These rules are taught in universities. People were taught that the old numbers - REAL ones - had to be separated from the imagery. They have leaed to describe a series of two parties that have a real imaginary complex number. The rules say that every time you multiply by the real real is real. Multiply by real imaginary (real imaginary) and imaginary gain. Multiply by imagination and imagination will have less real. Simple, easy to implement. But how does this impact on math? What happens to breasts, cosines, logarithms, and the other when using complex instead of real numbers? A large number of mathematicians - including the legendary Leonhard Euler - have worked on this issue. Is emerging as a complex mathematical standard. The problems began to become apparent. The simplistic concept of ROOT -1 was really bad. Should have been "one of the roots of -1. There are actually two. So, the problem of multiple solutions appeared. As I wrote, this problem can be seen by considering the number antilogarithm an imaginary in a spiral COMPLEX in the area. What is the lowest point? One for each tu of helix. Therefore, multiple solutions. Continued research by deepening the depth of Euler GAMMA FUNCTION. Here, numbers below zero, the result of the denial in units of measurement. This function is called denial, which is also a spiral. I asked the riddle, how do you create a diagram of the Gamma function, when in a spiral and not the other? Riddle me to solve a surprising answer. NATURE In the present context, does the imagination. There is no solution to the range when using complex mathematics. N. complex space. Ie the square root of -1 has two answers, but insists that nature has to take two at once. This is very different to the roots of real numbers. The roots are 2 * 4 * O -2. The roots are -1 * Y * i1-i1. Take two or none, in the case of the gamma function. Otherwise, the puzzle is solved. I1, but the spiral to the left, whereas go-i1 makes spiral right. Realization of the spiral also go to the left and right spiral STOP. Therefore, it is equal to none. Nature has rejected imagery. At this point I wrote (solution.htm) that "If it can be shown to other functions not related to the gamma function and having a function of denial, refusing to Nature imaginary axis in this way, then we can say that rejects the complex mathematics as a human product. "I had not expected that the nature is revealed to me then a function that does the imaginary axis, not a function of denial. It is the inverse of the exponential. That is, the logarithm. > From the first page, you can see the Euler equation for the exponential (exp (I x) = cos (x) + i sin (x)), as a spiral. You can see that exp (i pi) is -1. Therefore, no exp (i 3PI). Not so exp (i 5Pi). Thus, all odd imaginary multiples of Pi. Then all the negative values of odd imaginary multiples. Therefore, the registration of all -1 is positive and negative odd imaginary multiples of Pi. It 'really does not matter whether or E OR. Only that there are problems. So, given the logarithm of zero. This is known to be less infinite. But less than zero? This may seem a silly question, but it is not. We have examined the record of any negative number for the registration of positive equivalent, plus one or more odd imaginary multiples of Pi. Therefore, the registration will be less than zero to infinity, as the record of zero - but with a difference. For all the negative numbers, as is the logarithm of positive, but together with the serried ranks of Imaginario ODD PI. As numbers rise, that more and more towards zero, and the real part of the logarithm is negative infinity down. Then they hit zero. Rows of numbers imaginary STOP. That's it! They disappear. One might call a singularity, but more than that. There are endless odd imaginary multiples of Pi, and stopped near the point X = 0. Then again refuses the kind of fantasy. Natural laws are all over the continuous fluid. For a whole family of numbers - all the odd imaginary multiples of Pi - and inference, therefore, a set - the set of all imaginary - in the end it is quite unnatural. Therefore, the imaginary numbers are the imagination of men. Nature does not think. Charles Douglas Wehner