Probability Fact or Fiction

Probability Fact or Fiction Probability? Fictions do or what is the possibility that a coin flipped the land when the owners? Scientists that there is a probability of 50%. Necessarily so, but this? From reading my other articles should be clear that a theory of our universe for me? I am particularly interested in consensus reality. A universe created by our collective consciousness, which falls within the boundaries of our collective belief systems.I often feel that science is not so much the determination of the laws of the universe, as is commonly thought, but in some ways, the creation of laws through the strengthening of self-consciousness that continually maintain the structure and behavior of this planet. Throwing a coin, your subconscious beliefs dictate that if you throw enough, you reach the long tail. The concept of probability, chance and chaos are so well known throughout the world? S mind is impossible to convince you that you have the power to make the coin shows heads every time.If do the same experiment, for example, tossing a coin 1000 times trying to get the money from the head, and record the results as you go, you can see, after the first 50 launch was a huge bias towards the coin is the head, for e.gHeads Tails31 19Odd? Not really, mathematicians and statisticians will tell you that, if it continues the launch of currency, and more aggregated data, which dropped more.That the average is quite possible, and if the physical world follows the laws of probability as rigidly as they say, probable.But ... insurmountably this experiment was vitiated by prejudice of the person conducting the experiment. If the person with a faith full of 100% that the coin land heads every time, actually had the power to make this happen, there is no way ever that the power, because faith is impossible to 100% packaging and the probability of randomness concepts from the day he was bo. Faith can be more realistic than ever ... heads will be held well, 50% really.If who managed to convince yourself 100% that had the power to influence the introduction of coins, and then dropped the money and came up heads, what? opportunities? entering the second head start? Still 50%. What? S sense, as you would assume that there is less chance of reaching the top again if you have already, but the probability that a second (or at any other time) to pull the currency still has a 50% chance of being heads. However, in the launch of the currency for a second time to be aware that you have only one head, and this means niggling doubt that they were no longer 100% convinced that the money could have his head again. Starting again ... Heads! Incredible ... The two heads in a row, maybe? S something for this? It 'time to pull back. Are you still willing to be leader, but you can feel their faith and belief in decline, this time ... Heads again! Three in a row! What? S 12.5% chance that the traditional point of view of probability. About 1 / 10, very lucky I guess, but not exceptionally unlikely ... Next step. Four heads in a row would be quite unlikely, 6.25% chance, given the irrefutable laws of probability. His confidence in this project, money is not high at all ... This time, we have a tail! You lose again ... Doh! Colas ... told you! What? S random.But if anyone had said about the probability? What happens if schools, students are taught that nothing is random, but is simply determined by consensus that the observation of consciousness, based on their beliefs about the results? Are children, upon reaching adulthood, be able to throw a coin 1000 times and in each of the heads of time? Maybe, maybe not. But my point is that, apparently, demonstrable scientific experiments may have been contaminated by experimentation.If the conviction that people believe that scientists are unable to influence the likelihood, then the results are obtained to support this conviction if it is due to the fact that they are right, or because they are evil, but I believe that if everyone in the country right.Imagine same lottery numbers and saw the draw convinced? I? I'm going to win this week I feel? That can still leave a number of millions? Maybe, maybe not. But, once again, scientists are free to accept the fact that quantum particles can be influenced by the mere fact of our observations and expectations. So why not build the visible matter of these quantum particles? Due to its easier for them to accept strange events with an invisible sub-atomic particle that is something you can see, hear, taste and touch, like a coin or a die. If you do not see anything that supports this belief, I do not think. But if you believe what he does that happen, then you will never see in experimentation.If conviction is the key to define our reality, then, while maintaining a solid and strong belief system, is that religion, science, or a combination both, you are seriously reduce opportunities for us in this reality. We must restore our minds back to zero. See all? Demonstrable? e? observable? science and philosophy of religion or spiritual, as a child, from a neutral place where you can freely explore the possibilities, but being in a place where you can also explore other areas of conflict, without the possibility of contamination or rendering them invisible to their own situation preconceptions.If get too deep, it seems, in fact, so much so that they automatically reject any other reality shows ... this is dangerous, especially when taking into account the realities that are part of May have been drawn up with a malicious intent. About the Author Fuctup watch from a neutral point. Breaking rigid belief systems and to be open to many alteative realities is crucial to understanding the universe in which we live, and also to ensure that we are not maniuplated to buy into a system of false beliefs that religion and science. Mail info@johnnyfuctup.com with him in any comment on this article.